Re:Will this be our biggest ever river catch?
by klysm on Monday April 22, 2024 @01:14AM
(#40111568)
Calling plastics a carbon sink is dubious because you have to spend energy to get the oil out in the first place. How about calling it an oil sink?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Will this be our biggest ever river catch?
by scotty79 on Monday April 22, 2024 @04:23AM
(#40112368)
Still good. Way better than burning it.
Re:Will this be our biggest ever river catch?
by rTX5CMRXIfFG on Monday April 22, 2024 @11:10AM
(#40115161)
Not making it is way better
Re:Will this be our biggest ever river catch?
by scotty79 on Monday April 22, 2024 @02:32PM
(#40117292)
Depends on what you do with dug out oil instead of making plastic. If you do almost anything else it's worse than making plastic and landfilling it neatly at the end of useful life.
Re:Will this be our biggest ever river catch?
by klysm on Monday April 22, 2024 @03:54PM
(#40118853)
That’s leaning into a false dichotomy. Not extracting it in the first is clearly the best option
Re:Will this be our biggest ever river catch?
by scotty79 on Tuesday April 23, 2024 @05:06AM
(#40129983)
Of course. However if not making plastic means extracting more to burn to haul around heavier glass then it better to make and landfill plastic.
We are in terrible situation and nothing is simple and even simple stuff is hard to implement and can turn out negative when we implemented.
Things backfire. People are buying plug-in hybrids but then they almost never charge them so material is wasted and de facto ice cars are unnecessarily heavier.
Re:Will this be our biggest ever river catch?
by missedthecue on Monday April 22, 2024 @10:08AM
(#40114545)
You have to burn much more energy to get sand out of the ground (glass), bauxite out of the mine (aluminum), or trees out of the forest (paper).
It doesn't take much energy to get a ton of petroleum out, compared to a ton of sand, aluminum ore, or lumber.