News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Meta Llama 3. Parent comment

Re:Meta Llama 3 by szundi on Thursday April 18, 2024 @03:05PM (#40079634)
It is just the reverse: he is successful because he is like that and lots of founder ceos are jellies in comparison
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Meta Llama 3 by elevatedastalt on Thursday April 18, 2024 @03:13PM (#40079725)
I dunno. I find a conviction in passion in founder CEOs that is missing in folks who replace them.

Compare Larry & Sergey with Pichai, or Gates with Balmer.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Meta Llama 3 by spaceguillotine on Thursday April 18, 2024 @03:17PM (#40079767)
how can anyone doubt Ballmer's passion after his sweaty stage march. He ain't in charge anymore anyway. Gates was more methodical evil than passionate and his big moves were all just stabbing someone else to take their place.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Meta Llama 3 by RobotToaster on Thursday April 18, 2024 @05:31PM (#40080933)
I think he managed to buck the trend because, despite not being one, he liked developers (some would say a little too much)
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Meta Llama 3 by grepexdev on Thursday April 18, 2024 @03:20PM (#40079798)
Don't forget Gavin Belson and Action Jack Barker
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Meta Llama 3 by highwaylights on Thursday April 18, 2024 @04:36PM (#40080461)
Action Jack would still be at it but these days he prefers a nice piece of fish.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Meta Llama 3 by zmmmmm on Thursday April 18, 2024 @05:36PM (#40080979)
Satya Nadella is an interesting counter example.
[ Parent | on HN ]