Re:EVs are lowering Bay Area's carbon footprint
by Rebelgecko on Friday April 12, 2024 @10:46PM
(#40020041)
The paper[1] goes into this in more depth. COVID was definitely a factor, but not the only one. For example if you look at the YOY comparisons, both halves of 2021 hadlower emissions YOY than 2020. The H1 decrease you can blame on the COVID lockdowns that lasted until May. But by July 2020 everyone who was going to WFH was WFH, and by July 2021 many people who were WFH in 2020 were commuting again.
Re:EVs are lowering Bay Area's carbon footprint
by skeeter2020 on Saturday April 13, 2024 @12:01AM
(#40020385)
ICE cars are also more efficient and less poluting, which could also account for some of the decline.
Re:EVs are lowering Bay Area's carbon footprint
by jmankhan on Friday April 12, 2024 @10:38PM
(#40019997)
the study accounts for shelter-in-place mandates during COVID: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.3c09642
Re:EVs are lowering Bay Area's carbon footprint
by baryphonic on Friday April 12, 2024 @10:32PM
(#40019969)
I have been surprised that environmental activists haven't protested return-to-office policies for the incident increase in pollution. Seems like there is very little data backing up RTO other than commercial real estate sunk costs, and loads of costs like lost time commuting, energy used to commute, emissions due to traffic, etc.
Re:EVs are lowering Bay Area's carbon footprint
by floren on Friday April 12, 2024 @11:46PM
(#40020311)
I know of one huge international pharma company with a site in South SF that is reducing conference attendance with the stated purpose of reducing emissions, while simultaneously requiring all employees to be on-site 3 days a week regardless of job function (yes, lab workers have to be in the lab for their work, but plenty of positions spend most of their time on video calls with other sites in Sweden, Netherlands, England, China, India...)
Re:EVs are lowering Bay Area's carbon footprint
by solarpunk on Friday April 12, 2024 @10:42PM
(#40020017)
Wasn't this one of the reasons behind the Amazon walkouts
Re:EVs are lowering Bay Area's carbon footprint
by dalyons on Friday April 12, 2024 @10:36PM
(#40019985)
Do executive feelings count as data
Re:EVs are lowering Bay Area's carbon footprint
by tehjoker on Friday April 12, 2024 @11:04PM
(#40020132)
the lack of resistance to RTO from many political perspectives has been stunning tbh
Re:EVs are lowering Bay Area's carbon footprint
by sahila on Friday April 12, 2024 @11:33PM
(#40020262)
Wfh sure seems like a negative in terms of measured economic activity - less gas buying, fewer coffee and lunch purchases and happy hours, and or course depressed commerical real estate, all leading to lower tax in take. Happy to see the political upside.
Re:EVs are lowering Bay Area's carbon footprint
by tehjoker on Saturday April 13, 2024 @03:26PM
(#40025349)
the upside is its better for workers and the climate lol it also reduces the spread of COVID-19, which is an ongoing pandemic.
Re:EVs are lowering Bay Area's carbon footprint
by Gibbon1 on Friday April 12, 2024 @11:09PM
(#40020158)
At first I was for cars with higher MPG.
Then I was for more mass transit.
Finally I realized it'd be cheaper to move work closer to where we built houses for the peons to live instead of close to where the boss lives.
Nothing closer than a home office.
Re:EVs are lowering Bay Area's carbon footprint
by hettygreen on Friday April 12, 2024 @11:53PM
(#40020351)
Don't ruin it for me!
I only read the headline and was feeling justified purchasing 3000 pounds of globally mined steel, aluminum, rubber, plastic, graphite, copper, nickel, manganese and cobalt.
Re:EVs are lowering Bay Area's carbon footprint
by mepiethree on Saturday April 13, 2024 @12:03AM
(#40020393)
You can feel good. the carbon debt from manufacturing is amortized over the life of the car. As long as the car is driven more than 19,000 miles, EVs are better.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/19/business/electric-vehicle...
Convenient date range considering the global pandemic and WFH shift …