Re:After years of trying, the U.S. government may mandate sa...
by sharperguy on Tuesday April 09, 2024 @06:14PM
(#39984877)
A seatbelt is a small fraction of the total cost of a car. I wouldn't be surprised if a table saw with this feature is 10x the cost of one without it or more. It adds a ton of complexity to a fairly simple tool.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:After years of trying, the U.S. government may mandate sa...
by mey on Tuesday April 09, 2024 @06:20PM
(#39984939)
At scale the cost will come down. The actual tech is remarkably simple (which is a compliment to the design and engineering). The saw blade is wired up in such a way that it becomes a capactive touch sensor. When tripped a sacrifical brake is blasted into the blade that causes it stop and drop into the table.
It isn't going to cost 10x.
Re:After years of trying, the U.S. government may mandate sa...
by petee on Tuesday April 09, 2024 @06:57PM
(#39985241)
The modules are expensive, and it destroys the blade, which can be very expensive when using real industrial ones meant to be resharpened.
Personally I've had a very poor experience using a sawstop, as well as witnessing it cause younger guys to get overly confident
Re:After years of trying, the U.S. government may mandate sa...
by nostromo on Tuesday April 09, 2024 @06:47PM
(#39985158)
It's expensive because of the patent holders, not the technical complexity.
Re:After years of trying, the U.S. government may mandate sa...
by xdennis on Tuesday April 09, 2024 @08:37PM
(#39985770)
When the government mandates it there's no reason not to increase the price, just like how college tuitions rose exponentially when the government guaranteed the loans.