Re:Social Skill Training with Large Language Models
by jmole on Tuesday April 09, 2024 @09:08PM
(#39985965)
It'd be hard to read this kind of a response as anything but passive aggressive, unless you are actually sending their comment to ChatGPT on their behalf.
"Please use chatGPT to fix your comment" is just too snide to be useful, like "RTFM" or "just google it".
Re:Social Skill Training with Large Language Models
by VeryFinePrint on Tuesday April 09, 2024 @11:49PM
(#39986767)
I send their comment through ChatGPT, then paste is as an example in the response. "Please use ChatGPT, this is an example of what your comment would look like..."
Re:Social Skill Training with Large Language Models
by Teever on Wednesday April 10, 2024 @05:14AM
(#39988612)
It will be interesting to see when spiteful users start creating LLM powered bots that are designed to waste reddit moderator's time in such a way that the moderator's reaction doesn't rise to the level of a ban, but enough that it consumes a disproportionate amount of their time.
It'll be a fabulous display of malicious compliance where they're doing something somewhat similar to your suggestion of using chatgpt to rewrite their messages, but with an entirely different outcome than you intended.
I've noticed that ChatGPT can do a decent job rewording an angry message to be less toxic while drawing out the salient points. The output it produces a little stiff or stuffy, but I find that preferable to "authentic" toxic messages.
As a mod I find that removals have less sting when you provide the user with an alternative path forward to get what they want. When a removal isn't just a "wall of no", it feels less like a personal rejection. ChatGPT offers a path around that "wall of no" for users by a) showing them what the right way to make their comment is and b) gives them a path/tool to getting there nearly every time.