Re:XZ backdoor: "It's RCE, not auth bypass, and gated/unrepl...
by Muromec on Sunday March 31, 2024 @12:24AM
(#39881431)
The whole Chinese name and UTC+8 were a cover, as the person apparently was from EET
Re:XZ backdoor: "It's RCE, not auth bypass, and gated/unrepl...
by tw04 on Sunday March 31, 2024 @03:09AM
(#39882114)
While it ultimately doesn’t matter if it was Russia or China beyond potential political fallout. Do you have a link to the proof pointing towards EET?
Re:XZ backdoor: "It's RCE, not auth bypass, and gated/unrepl...
by Muromec on Sunday March 31, 2024 @05:58AM
(#39882875)
There was a link in this thread pointing to commit times analysis and it kinda checks out. Adding some cultural and outside world context, I can guess which alphabet this three-four-six-letter agency uses to spell it's name at least.
Re:XZ backdoor: "It's RCE, not auth bypass, and gated/unrepl...
by fredamaral on Saturday March 30, 2024 @11:19PM
(#39881076)
case closed. you are right... could of course make the things a bit more difficult for someone not backed by a state sponsor. but if that's the case, you are right.
Re:XZ backdoor: "It's RCE, not auth bypass, and gated/unrepl...
by tw04 on Saturday March 30, 2024 @11:22PM
(#39881101)
Sadly the only way to even have a chance of fighting this is to insist on new contributors being vetted in person, and even that won’t be fool-proof.
It’s also not scalable and likely won’t ever happen, but it’s the only solution I can come up with.
Or do you think they don’t have the resources to fake an identity?