Muromec

Eastern Europe of the Slavic variety enters the chat with a concept of patronymics. Nobody asks you if you want to have a middle name, it's always a deriative of your father's, by law.

My son was born in a country with doesn't write those in a birth certificate. When we went back, guess what -- they still added it by deriving it from my name.

>What if one of them is a Republican and one is a Democrat? We already see this in some systems today.

It's probably the same graph with two edges added or removed anyway.

You can use matrix and gate everything else into it on your rpi

That's not it, it's tax optimization, it's sibling with friends in a political parties. Easy to confuse them, looking almost the same, but it's in fact two separate concepts!

I would rather have protonmail without all the stuff they are adding there

I don't get elixir, maybe I'm not ruby brained enough. Too much syntax sugar for me

I heard escrow keys are supposed to solve this. Can't we deposit escrow keys to a legacy bank running cobol in mainframes and let it do its kyc/aml sanctions check and anti fraud on all transactions? That should solve it

That's a meme lizard people implanted into the conversation so you don't try hard enough.

If you perfectly evade government oversight being illegal doesn't matter much.

It's a weird idea of being physically present in the jurisdiction and not being subject to it's laws which kinda doesn't survive reality.

>But there will always be a government of some sort making the big decisions for the benefit of its ruling clique

That depends on how much resources said government can extract from the environment. Either by taking or by providing value in exchange.

One can imagine a level of technological advancement that makes violence impossible and trade unnecessary. Poof, no government.

Aviation is a good example if you want to have zero fatal mistakes. There is a way and there is a cost to do so.

The same way erlang is good example of how to run a highly available system with hot reload and observability and stuff. There is cost for that too.

Maybe not all of the projects need the same properties. I'm fine if some of the stuff is having scheduled or unscheduled maintenance. Some kind of government portal that I use once a year had my permission to be offline between 0300 and 0500 and then again after 1200.

Good llm

bad llm

I think opening something in the hex editor, changing necessary bytes and saving it is as general purpose as it gets. You usually don't distribute it (I remember they days when it was common however) due to law, so in practice people write code that hot-patches stuff after starting the process.

You can also just open gdb and patch the process on the fly when you need to do things.

At the end of the day there isn't much hard difference between source code and binary code. By design source code is usually easier to read and write, but it's all syntax sugar and transformations all the way down.

Easy: https://www.nexusmods.com/

don't forget game modding. it's the only way it even works

You can read and edit binary code just fine, it's much easier with AI too

CC details? We don't do that here, a need a QR code for ideal/wero/whatev, CC are not infra-sovereign enough

I see the logo of my company in this picture and I don't have it my harness dropdown. I guess they hallucilied (vibe truthed?) the list just a little bit.

You are all dismissing but I specifically bough an LCD display so my thing can display emotions on it as it goes through the stuff

Now you are on a list. Maybe even in a pdf file

Something something snowcrash

DS4 in the web version has censorship of the output. As long as model ignores the decoy text and doesn't act on it, everything works fine

Cyberpank is having a really nice and modern mobile app for your bank but all the interface doesn't give you any hint that transfering money out of the country is even possible.

The same way it understands what all the other tokens mean -- we throw them at the wall and beat it with a stick until it behaves.

It can happen that you would be able to inject them if there is a bug, same way sql injections work.

You have all the same pieces -- untrusted input on the left and the thing that accepts a stream of tokens on the right. In the middle could be anything, especially when vibecoded.

You should treat inference provider as a C2 node of a rootkit. As long as it's your c2 or it's aligned with you somewhat, you are fine

>some cases, tools are added mid-run to avoid a giant prefix miss

Wait, can you actually do that? The model should not exactly care where in the context the tools are, but I haven't realised it's a thing that works

Sure, maybe. Also we have shit roads, cold winters and there is too much fat and meat in the diet. What does it have to do with anything and how what you say is helpful?

There is a centuries old holywar on this subject that you are not a party of. Just don't