Re:Tesla starts using 'Supervised Full Self-Driving' language
by saghm on Saturday March 30, 2024 @01:20AM
(#39872063)
Why do you think that "having a vision and working towards it" necessitates naming the product as if the vision already exists _today_? If you don't think that it does, why are you intentionally trying to derail the discussion by ignoring the actual thing that people are criticizing?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Tesla starts using 'Supervised Full Self-Driving' language
by dzhiurgis on Saturday March 30, 2024 @02:48AM
(#39872433)
If we down to naming things - my Apple products are inedible, AI personal assistants do not assist in most cases, footlong subs are 6”, SuperCruise is SomeplaceCruise…
Re:Tesla starts using 'Supervised Full Self-Driving' language
by saghm on Saturday March 30, 2024 @04:21PM
(#39878243)
Let's not pretend that naming a computer "Macintosh" but it not being edible and calling a car "full self-driving" that can't self-drive fully are equally confusing. One of them is inaccurate about a purpose that no one actually intends to use it for, and the other is inaccurate about a purpose that people do actually want to use it for, and they're paying for it because it sounds like it fulfills tht purpose.