News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:FuryGpu – Custom PCIe FPGA GPU by actionfromafar on Wednesday March 27, 2024 @05:32AM (#39837037)
How good would a Ryzen with 32 cores be if it did just graphics?
Re:FuryGpu – Custom PCIe FPGA GPU by __alexs on Wednesday March 27, 2024 @07:25AM (#39837688)
15 fps on an oldish Epyc 64 core https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2tn0bZcQf0E
Re:FuryGpu – Custom PCIe FPGA GPU by tux3 on Wednesday March 27, 2024 @05:34AM (#39837054)
You can run Crysis in software rendering on a high core count AMD CPU.

It's terrible use of the hardware and the performance is far from stellar, but you can!

Re:FuryGpu – Custom PCIe FPGA GPU by immibis on Wednesday March 27, 2024 @06:55AM (#39837520)
Wasn't Intel Larrabee something like that? Get a bunch of dumb x86 cores together and tell them to do graphics?
Re:FuryGpu – Custom PCIe FPGA GPU by actionfromafar on Wednesday March 27, 2024 @07:15AM (#39837633)
I'm so sad Larrabee or similar things never took off. No, it might not have benchmarked well against contemporary graphics cards, but I think these matrixes of x86 cores could have come to great use for cool things not necessarily related to graphics.
Re:FuryGpu – Custom PCIe FPGA GPU by fancyfredbot on Wednesday March 27, 2024 @07:29AM (#39837717)
Intel launched Larabee as Xeon Phi for non-graphics purposes. Turns out it wasn't especially good at those either. You can still pick one up on eBay today for not very much.
Re:FuryGpu – Custom PCIe FPGA GPU by actionfromafar on Wednesday March 27, 2024 @08:27AM (#39838141)
That's where we have to agree to (potentially) disagree. I lament that these or similar designs didn't last longer in the market, so people could learn how to harness them.

Imagine for instance hard real time tasks, each one task running on its own separate core.

Re:FuryGpu – Custom PCIe FPGA GPU by rjsw on Wednesday March 27, 2024 @09:18AM (#39838646)
I think Intel should have made more effort to get cheap Larabee dev boards onto the market, they could have been using chips that didn't run at full speed or with too many broken cores to sell at full price.
Re:FuryGpu – Custom PCIe FPGA GPU by fancyfredbot on Thursday March 28, 2024 @04:12AM (#39848771)
I think Intel have similar designs? The Xeon Phi had 60 cores, and their high core count CPUs have 56. The GPU max 1550 has 128 low power xe cores.
Re:FuryGpu – Custom PCIe FPGA GPU by Y_Y on Wednesday March 27, 2024 @08:26AM (#39838129)
The novelty of sshing into a PCI card is nice though. I remember trying to use them at a hpc cluster, all the convenience of wrangling GPUs but at a fraction of the performance
Re:FuryGpu – Custom PCIe FPGA GPU by bee_rider on Wednesday March 27, 2024 @10:48AM (#39839947)
Probably not aided by the fact that conventional Xeon core counts were sneaking up on them—not quite caught up, but anybody could see the trajectory—and offered a much more familiar environment.
Re:FuryGpu – Custom PCIe FPGA GPU by actionfromafar on Wednesday March 27, 2024 @03:48PM (#39843732)
Yes, I agree. Still unfortunate. I think the concept was very promising. But Intel had no appetite for burning money on it to see where it would go in the long run.
Re:FuryGpu – Custom PCIe FPGA GPU by erik on Wednesday March 27, 2024 @04:36PM (#39844289)
Larrabee was mostly x86 cores, but it did have sampling/texturing hardware because it's way more efficient to do those particular things in the 3d pipeline with dedicated hardware.