Still i think the point should stand no matter how precise we get here. The cost of labor absolutely dwarfs the cost of electricity. That was what i wanted to hit on while completely acknowledging the numbers are rough.
Our company buys it for us to "stay ahead", whether we use it or not, we're paying for it.
No, that is literally your claim combined with the claim of the original poster.
In your first post you claimed you "had" to use it. Now you say it's optional?
Modern AI is a whole lot more than just shitting out spam on the internet.
What mines?
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/sudbury/cote-gold-mine-automa...
Canadian oil sands operation using Autonomous haul trucks.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Z9w-mUoUsY
This mine in Arizona is in progress at this time.
https://im-mining.com/2023/09/15/freeport-says-bagdad-to-hav...
Rio Tinto says they have 130 autonomous units.
It is not surprising to me anymore the threads that get pulled to justify this insane hype, but what does shock me is that it's going on 8 months of the same very tired and thin arguments that get smaller and smaller in their claims the more questions you ask.
"In 2021, the global electricity transmission and distribution market generated some 255.6 billion U.S. dollars in revenue, up from 248.5 billion U.S. dollars in the previous year"
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1350454/forecast-electri....
Global electricity production is about 30 PWh per year and wholesale electricity costs are about $100 / MWh around the world. That’s about $3T. (Numbers are rough, don’t get pedantic)
Yes. Very much so.
Some back of enveloping. The worldwide labor market is USD$70trillion. If you save 1% of the time of the worldwide labor market (that's quite reasonable for autocomplete etc right?) that's USD$700billion. A quick Google says the global electricity revenues are USD$255billion.
So if you have a way to save %1 of human labor it's economically worth tripling power generation to make use of it.