News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Mutt on Windows Without WSL by xvilka on Sunday March 24, 2024 @10:57PM (#39812508)
Mutt is exactly something that would be nice to rewrite in Rust, moreover, splitting into various crates of working with email, so that it will be possible to reuse the same code for both TUI and GUI clients.
Re:Mutt on Windows Without WSL by djha-skin on Sunday March 24, 2024 @11:34PM (#39812647)
Already done: https://pimalaya.org/
Re:Mutt on Windows Without WSL by abound on Monday March 25, 2024 @12:13AM (#39812809)
Re:Mutt on Windows Without WSL by xvilka on Monday March 25, 2024 @05:32AM (#39814202)
It looks abandoned according to the site updates.
Re:Mutt on Windows Without WSL by homarp on Monday March 25, 2024 @08:58AM (#39815738)
meli last commit is yesterday. Last release 3 months ago
Re:Mutt on Windows Without WSL by mimotomo2009 on Monday March 25, 2024 @07:14AM (#39814792)
It took only a second to see what I would miss as like on most of the mail clients: why isn't it possible to configure the list of mails to see not only the sender but the e-mail address? I only know three e-mail clients where I can configure it: mutt, betterbird and evolution. But maybe I'm old and no one would like to see that "bill gates <[email protected]>" is not from bill gates before opening the mail (and render the contents). The phisher are thankful.
Re:Mutt on Windows Without WSL by Karellen on Monday March 25, 2024 @10:02AM (#39816449)
You can do it in Claws Mail (also available on Windows):

Configuration -> Preferences -> Display/Summaries -> Message List -> Displayed in From Column: Name | Address | Name and Address

Re:Mutt on Windows Without WSL by lsllc on Monday March 25, 2024 @08:53AM (#39815693)
So this looks like it might even support "cloud" based email services with OAuth2/MFA authentication such as Outlook/Exchange in the cloud:

https://pimalaya.org/himalaya/cli/latest/configuration/outlo...

Re:Mutt on Windows Without WSL by consp on Monday March 25, 2024 @03:45AM (#39813600)
> so that it will be possible to reuse the same code for both TUI and GUI clients.

Why must a generaly good improvement these days always start on HN with "rewrite in rust" like it's the only language which still matters. Leave that up to the developer to what they prefer for the job.

Re:Mutt on Windows Without WSL by roydivision on Monday March 25, 2024 @04:07AM (#39813748)
You're new here aren't you?
Re:Mutt on Windows Without WSL by ParetoOptimal on Monday March 25, 2024 @09:34AM (#39816097)
> Why must a generaly good improvement these days always start on HN with "rewrite in rust" like it's the only language which still matters.

I'm guessing so that its likely to 1) be safer by default, 2) likely to get more contributors, 3) more likely to work cross-platform, and 4) more likely to get attention and survive as a project.

Re:Mutt on Windows Without WSL by BirAdam on Monday March 25, 2024 @11:12AM (#39817321)
"memory safe by default" but not necessarily "safer" by default. A code base that has been battle tested in production for decades will likely be safer in every other way than an entirely new project that has got thrown up on a git repo yesterday.