Re:Dear Paul Graham, there is no cookie banner law
by madmoose on Monday March 18, 2024 @08:31AM
(#39743413)
I've stopped going to Ars Technica exactly because their cookie pop-up lets me know that Condé Nast wants to share my data with at least (according to the popup) 159 partners.
They have so many "partners" that their cookie popup comes with a search bar.
56 of their "partners" want my precise geolocation data!
16 "partners" want to actively scan my device!
101 "partners" want to "match and combine data from other data sources" (I can't disable or object to this)
102 "partners" want to identify my device. I also can't object to this.
The only way I can really object is to close the tab, so that's what I do.
Re:Dear Paul Graham, there is no cookie banner law
by stefanka on Monday March 18, 2024 @09:40AM
(#39744353)
> The only way I can really object is to close the tab, so that's what I do.
Isn't it too late by then?
Re:Dear Paul Graham, there is no cookie banner law
by Jensson on Monday March 18, 2024 @11:30AM
(#39745886)
Legally no, they can't store his data if he doesn't click yes.
Re:Dear Paul Graham, there is no cookie banner law
by p_l on Monday March 18, 2024 @01:55PM
(#39747666)
Considering their consent banner isn't legal under GDPR anyway, I'd be wary of expecting them to be compliant with that either.
Re:Dear Paul Graham, there is no cookie banner law
by caskstrength on Monday March 18, 2024 @09:02AM
(#39743830)
The problem is that most people don't want to pay for any of the internet services they use either.
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2021/07/facebook-adverti...