News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Are Stanford Students Just (Really Excellent) Sheep? by wmf on Monday May 14, 2012 @05:44PM (#3973512)
The admissions people say they reject excellent-but-bland applications, but perhaps it's a matter of degree.
Re:Are Stanford Students Just (Really Excellent) Sheep? by alwold on Monday May 14, 2012 @05:51PM (#3973542)
I think by "bland" they just mean that they reject people who don't have enough of the conforming resume-building activities that they expect :)
Re:Are Stanford Students Just (Really Excellent) Sheep? by Spearchucker on Monday May 14, 2012 @05:57PM (#3973566)
There's a school of thought in the UK that feels institutions like this reject applications from applicants who's family don't have deep pockets.

Similarly, there's the perception that Eton is capable of producing well-educated idiots.

Understand me here - this isn't my view. Just saying it's a view that's out there.

Re:Are Stanford Students Just (Really Excellent) Sheep? by socksy on Monday May 14, 2012 @06:04PM (#3973593)
I'm not sure Eton is really applicable here, since the income of your parents matters a whole lot more than the application process (and Eton suffer for it in the league tables) — and whilst you may argue that Ivy League schools do just that, I doubt it's quite to the same extent.
Re:Are Stanford Students Just (Really Excellent) Sheep? by 234547556 on Monday May 14, 2012 @06:27PM (#3973693)
Bear in mind that the ivy leagues get to grade their own students whereas the etonians sit national exams...
Re:Are Stanford Students Just (Really Excellent) Sheep? by EricDeb on Monday May 14, 2012 @08:44PM (#3974214)
Yes... so instead they accept people who superficially differentiate themselves and pretend to be non-conformists which then becomes another "admission strategy."