Re:Are Stanford Students Just (Really Excellent) Sheep?
by wmf on Monday May 14, 2012 @05:44PM
(#3973512)
The admissions people say they reject excellent-but-bland applications, but perhaps it's a matter of degree.
Re:Are Stanford Students Just (Really Excellent) Sheep?
by alwold on Monday May 14, 2012 @05:51PM
(#3973542)
I think by "bland" they just mean that they reject people who don't have enough of the conforming resume-building activities that they expect :)
Re:Are Stanford Students Just (Really Excellent) Sheep?
by Spearchucker on Monday May 14, 2012 @05:57PM
(#3973566)
There's a school of thought in the UK that feels institutions like this reject applications from applicants who's family don't have deep pockets.
Similarly, there's the perception that Eton is capable of producing well-educated idiots.
Understand me here - this isn't my view. Just saying it's a view that's out there.
Re:Are Stanford Students Just (Really Excellent) Sheep?
by socksy on Monday May 14, 2012 @06:04PM
(#3973593)
I'm not sure Eton is really applicable here, since the income of your parents matters a whole lot more than the application process (and Eton suffer for it in the league tables) — and whilst you may argue that Ivy League schools do just that, I doubt it's quite to the same extent.
Colleges go out of their way to select 'herd-like conformists' during the admissions process, so why would they then try to change them once they got there? This Brooks article never made any sense to me.