Re:Linux TTY font for Chinese, but treat it as a syllabic wr...
by nneonneo on Wednesday March 13, 2024 @07:06PM
(#39698654)
Japanese do have shinjitai characters which are also simplified, but differently, although there are definitely fewer such characters than in Simplified Chinese.
My favorite is the simplification of 龍 (dragon) - in Simplified Chinese, they took the right hand side and derived 龙; in Japanese Shinjitai, they took the left hand side and obtained 竜.
Re:Linux TTY font for Chinese, but treat it as a syllabic wr...
by karmasimida on Wednesday March 13, 2024 @07:35PM
(#39698875)
Chinese speakers would probably think it is 龟 instead loll
Re:Linux TTY font for Chinese, but treat it as a syllabic wr...
by SuperNinKenDo on Wednesday March 13, 2024 @08:06PM
(#39699095)
I learned Japanese first, and 龟 still regularly trips me up when reading simplified characters.
Re:Linux TTY font for Chinese, but treat it as a syllabic wr...
by throwaway2990 on Wednesday March 13, 2024 @07:26PM
(#39698797)
It wasn’t too complicated. 95% of the country couldn’t read it write. And printing was impossible.
Re:Linux TTY font for Chinese, but treat it as a syllabic wr...
by yorwba on Thursday March 14, 2024 @05:51AM
(#39701966)
You may want to read up on the history of printing in East Asia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_printing_in_East_As...
Of course, the degree to which the complexity is disdained varies depending on who you ask: Japanese saw fit to reuse mostly as-is, Hangul chose to replace it wholesale, and so on. Simplfied Chinese is somewhere in-between, not replacing wholesale but simplifying characters often to the point of bastardization.