News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Linux TTY font for Chinese, but treat it as a syllabic wr... by Dalewyn on Wednesday March 13, 2024 @07:00PM (#39698614)
You jest, but Simplified Chinese came into existence because Traditional Chinese is (and derivatives like Japanese Kanji are) generally regarded as too complicated.

Of course, the degree to which the complexity is disdained varies depending on who you ask: Japanese saw fit to reuse mostly as-is, Hangul chose to replace it wholesale, and so on. Simplfied Chinese is somewhere in-between, not replacing wholesale but simplifying characters often to the point of bastardization.

Re:Linux TTY font for Chinese, but treat it as a syllabic wr... by nneonneo on Wednesday March 13, 2024 @07:06PM (#39698654)
Japanese do have shinjitai characters which are also simplified, but differently, although there are definitely fewer such characters than in Simplified Chinese.

My favorite is the simplification of 龍 (dragon) - in Simplified Chinese, they took the right hand side and derived 龙; in Japanese Shinjitai, they took the left hand side and obtained 竜.

Re:Linux TTY font for Chinese, but treat it as a syllabic wr... by karmasimida on Wednesday March 13, 2024 @07:35PM (#39698875)
Chinese speakers would probably think it is 龟 instead loll
Re:Linux TTY font for Chinese, but treat it as a syllabic wr... by SuperNinKenDo on Wednesday March 13, 2024 @08:06PM (#39699095)
I learned Japanese first, and 龟 still regularly trips me up when reading simplified characters.
Re:Linux TTY font for Chinese, but treat it as a syllabic wr... by throwaway2990 on Wednesday March 13, 2024 @07:26PM (#39698797)
It wasn’t too complicated. 95% of the country couldn’t read it write. And printing was impossible.
Re:Linux TTY font for Chinese, but treat it as a syllabic wr... by yorwba on Thursday March 14, 2024 @05:51AM (#39701966)
You may want to read up on the history of printing in East Asia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_printing_in_East_As...