Re:Why you need to work with the machine, not against it
by georgieporgie on Friday May 11, 2012 @02:24PM
(#3960574)
That didn't seem very cohesive or insightful.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why you need to work with the machine, not against it
by novalis on Friday May 11, 2012 @02:51PM
(#3960706)
I found that:
"We’re experiencing the natural and healthy fluctuations of a market that is deeply starved for technical skills, or at least people who can use their creativity and intuition in unison with technology."
Is something that escapes a lot of people these days and something I agree with and have taken notice of for a while, so it may not be insightful to some but I believe it can help a lot of people to find perspective.
Re:Why you need to work with the machine, not against it
by jmtame on Friday May 11, 2012 @02:30PM
(#3960599)
The original version was a bit more harsh and I had to revise it. I was fairly critical of people who went into debt over liberal arts degrees and argued that if you're going into debt, do it in a degree that's going to make a return on your investment.
Edit: the original article is here if you're interested http://jmtame.posterous.com/private/kjInGGicAa
Re:Why you need to work with the machine, not against it
by FreakLegion on Friday May 11, 2012 @04:59PM
(#3961376)
I have three liberal arts degrees and think your criticism is completely valid. People shouldn't go into debt for liberal arts degrees. If you're good enough you'll get a full ride; if not, you're only being admitted as slave labor to fill lower division teaching slots[1].
Unfortunately, most people who pursue liberal arts degrees aren't interested in "technical" subjects. And when you get down to brass tacks, what someone is capable of is largely a function of what interests them.
1. Not to knock teaching. It was one of my favorite parts of grad school.
Re:Why you need to work with the machine, not against it
by georgieporgie on Saturday May 12, 2012 @12:03AM
(#3962706)
I really don't look forward to a future where everyone is some variant of a STEM major. Talk about pedantry and a lack of cultural texture...
Re:Why you need to work with the machine, not against it
by mortuus on Friday May 11, 2012 @02:46PM
(#3960665)
The reference to the Redditor that automated his work and took a disproportionate portion of the bonus pool was a strong example of changes to come. Any thoughts on that piece?
Re:Why you need to work with the machine, not against it
by lhnz on Friday May 11, 2012 @05:18PM
(#3961456)
An opinion: anything which is that easy to turn into a process will be commoditised.
Re:Why you need to work with the machine, not against it
by georgieporgie on Saturday May 12, 2012 @12:01AM
(#3962702)
The Reddit question wasn't really what I would consider relevant for HN, but I personally found the ethical issues at least a little bit interesting. I commented on it: my thoughts being that he should stay under the radar of management and do side work to earn more money. This is by no means ethical, and I'm assuming a fairly dysfunctional company structure, but in my experience that's the way things work in the real world.