Going to be absolutely wild the first time it spits out a specific enough paragraph to identify the company whose data was used to train the model.

Or spits out the terms of someone's confidential settlement agreement.

If they're uniquely positioned to do it, it probably doesn't need to be done. Who is going to usurp them if they don't?

I find this comment interesting in the context of having read a lot of brain-dead takes on "capitalism", some of which it liken it to feudalism.

I find it interesting because it shows how different those two are.

Under feudal zero-sum world your question would make complete sense, but under a capitalist positive-sum world, it seems to me the answer is just "a lot of profit would be left on the table" (ie positive-sum mutual-benefit transactions), which explains why docusign would do it.

I think a lot of danger can come from competing against imaginary forces. You get things like atom bombs and paranoia.

Yes, and extending existing contracts based on new requirements.

But also contract validation, like check if something missing or finding loopholes. If they are sneaky, they could sell that information to lawyers, who can definitely make use of it.

I'm not inherently pro-AI, but there are indeed valid and interesting use cases for such models, if the data can be anonymized correctly. And I'm not sure if it makes sense to single out DocuSign, because there are probably many companies which train their models on similar data.