News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Microsoft strikes deal with Mistral in push beyond OpenAI.

Re:Microsoft strikes deal with Mistral in push beyond OpenAI by azinman2 on Monday February 26, 2024 @04:56PM (#39517217)
What I don’t get is that mistral is really only possible because of Meta.. and Meta has a user limit on the license. Does that not apply to Microsoft hosting this? Isn’t the economics quite weird here? I’d be pissed if I were meta that someone took my model that I spent millions on and now will host a fine tuned version for money facilitated by Microsoft.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Microsoft strikes deal with Mistral in push beyond OpenAI by allanrbo on Monday February 26, 2024 @05:43PM (#39517666)
Why do you say Mistral only possible because of Meta?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Microsoft strikes deal with Mistral in push beyond OpenAI by azinman2 on Monday February 26, 2024 @06:08PM (#39517948)
It’s built on top of llama 2.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Microsoft strikes deal with Mistral in push beyond OpenAI by piwi on Monday February 26, 2024 @06:16PM (#39518034)
I'm not so sure. Do you have a source?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Microsoft strikes deal with Mistral in push beyond OpenAI by sdrg822 on Monday February 26, 2024 @06:18PM (#39518054)
It is not.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Microsoft strikes deal with Mistral in push beyond OpenAI by azinman2 on Monday February 26, 2024 @06:38PM (#39518228)
Looks like I’m wrong! I swore this was the case (so many models are), but not this one. Good for them!
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Microsoft strikes deal with Mistral in push beyond OpenAI by Klaus23 on Monday February 26, 2024 @07:21PM (#39518529)
There is a leaked prototype based on llama, but the rest are their own models.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Microsoft strikes deal with Mistral in push beyond OpenAI by Zambyte on Monday February 26, 2024 @06:15PM (#39518017)
You got a source for that?
[ Parent | on HN ]