News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Vert.x (JVM async) vs Node.js Http benchmarks results by pohl on Wednesday May 09, 2012 @02:35PM (#3949902)
Could you clarify that? Are you saying that if the response is sent within the same second that the request came in that it contributes to the metric?

Or would a response that is sent 30 seconds after the request came in contribute to the metric too?

Re:Vert.x (JVM async) vs Node.js Http benchmarks results by ww520 on Wednesday May 09, 2012 @02:45PM (#3949932)
It doesn't matter whether a request straddles a second or not in a throughput measuring benchmark when you saturate the system. A client would only count a request when its request call has returned. Runs it for N minutes, count up how many requests have completed, then divide the total with the time and you got req/sec.

Besides the benchmark has run for a minute. I doubt each request lasts 30 seconds.

Re:Vert.x (JVM async) vs Node.js Http benchmarks results by purplefox on Wednesday May 09, 2012 @04:06PM (#3950226)
+1.

The system is in steady state, i.e. queues of requests/responses aren't growing. Therefore it doesn't actually matter if you count the requests or the responses.