News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on AI behavior guardrails should be public. Parent comment

Re:AI behavior guardrails should be public by asdff on Wednesday February 21, 2024 @02:31PM (#39458357)
Transparency may also subject these companies to litigation from groups that feel they are misrepresented in whatever way in the model.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:AI behavior guardrails should be public by Jason_Protell on Wednesday February 21, 2024 @02:40PM (#39458484)
This makes me wonder, how much lawyering is involved in the development of these tools?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:AI behavior guardrails should be public by bluefirebrand on Wednesday February 21, 2024 @02:45PM (#39458538)
I often wonder if corporate lawyers just tell tech founders whatever they want to hear.

At a previous healthcare startup our founder asked us to build some really dodgy stuff with healthcare data. He assured us that it "cleared legal", but from everything I could tell it was in direct violation of the local healthcare info privacy acts.

I chose to find a new job at the time.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:AI behavior guardrails should be public by photoGrant on Wednesday February 21, 2024 @02:52PM (#39458618)
I've had 'AI Attorneys' on Twitter unable to even debate the most basic of arguments. It is definitely a self fulfilling death spiral and no one wants to check reality.
[ Parent | on HN ]