News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Nobel Prize winner Gregg Semenza tallies tenth retraction by aetherson on Wednesday February 14, 2024 @11:20PM (#39379064)
I'm pretty sure that this Nobel Prize winner does not work at a for profit university.
Re:Nobel Prize winner Gregg Semenza tallies tenth retraction by tomlockwood on Wednesday February 14, 2024 @11:29PM (#39379114)
Journals are also absolutely involved and incentivised.
Re:Nobel Prize winner Gregg Semenza tallies tenth retraction by derbOac on Thursday February 15, 2024 @12:23AM (#39379414)
For what it's worth, I sort of read that as "universities incentivized to maximize profit or income", not literally formally for-profit universities. Sort of a biting remark about typical university motivations, not literal.

Even if the poster didn't intend it that way, I think it could easily be read that way.

Re:Nobel Prize winner Gregg Semenza tallies tenth retraction by croes on Thursday February 15, 2024 @12:47AM (#39379548)
Just because it's non-profit doesn't mean it's not about money.
Re:Nobel Prize winner Gregg Semenza tallies tenth retraction by dekhn on Thursday February 15, 2024 @01:03PM (#39386018)
He works at Johns Hopkins, which is a private university that works closely with a health system called Johns Hopkins and the Johns Hopkins hospital (the medical school). When you say "for profit", be aware that they definitely take money from the government and patients and use it to develop new intellectual property that generates large amounts of money for them (although I guess the "profit" from that doesn't benefit the shareholders).

These "non-profits" have multi-billion dollar budgets and are highly "profitable" depending on how you like to define it. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/20/opinion/nonprofit-hospita... In these cases, the non-profits are given tax incentives provide a certain amount of community benefit.