News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:European Court of Human Rights bans weakening of secure e... by miohtama on Wednesday February 14, 2024 @12:01PM (#39372175)
This decision was needed because the EU was about to ban end-to-end encryption. It’s not the EU commission, but a judge that ruled. AFAIK Commission can still ignore this.
Re:European Court of Human Rights bans weakening of secure e... by ko27 on Wednesday February 14, 2024 @01:03PM (#39372978)
You have it the other way around. Majority of EU member countries wanted to to ban E2E, but the EU institutions prevented that.
Re:European Court of Human Rights bans weakening of secure e... by dmichulke on Thursday February 15, 2024 @01:22AM (#39379697)
No, the ECHR is not a EU institution, it's just European.

The bad guys here are the commission and some EU member states.

Re:European Court of Human Rights bans weakening of secure e... by 0dayz on Thursday February 15, 2024 @08:51AM (#39382669)
Here's the actual position accord to the commission:

https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-9-2023-00166...

Re:European Court of Human Rights bans weakening of secure e... by miohtama on Thursday February 15, 2024 @12:01PM (#39385131)
As it is Ylva Johansson, the hater of freedom of speech and the champion of scanning software companies, speaking in this document, here is her background:

https://balkaninsight.com/2023/09/25/who-benefits-inside-the...

Re:European Court of Human Rights bans weakening of secure e... by gpderetta on Wednesday February 14, 2024 @12:17PM (#39372367)
They in fact cannot.
Re:European Court of Human Rights bans weakening of secure e... by moffkalast on Wednesday February 14, 2024 @01:15PM (#39373121)
Ursula on suicide watch.
Re:European Court of Human Rights bans weakening of secure e... by asyx on Thursday February 15, 2024 @02:57AM (#39380197)
As far as I remember, the commission tried to introduce the chat control nonsense but the parliament shut it down.