Re:European Court of Human Rights bans weakening of secure e...
by miohtama on Wednesday February 14, 2024 @12:01PM
(#39372175)
This decision was needed because the EU was about to ban end-to-end encryption. It’s not the EU commission, but a judge that ruled. AFAIK Commission can still ignore this.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:European Court of Human Rights bans weakening of secure e...
by ko27 on Wednesday February 14, 2024 @01:03PM
(#39372978)
You have it the other way around. Majority of EU member countries wanted to to ban E2E, but the EU institutions prevented that.
Re:European Court of Human Rights bans weakening of secure e...
by dmichulke on Thursday February 15, 2024 @01:22AM
(#39379697)
No, the ECHR is not a EU institution, it's just European.
The bad guys here are the commission and some EU member states.
Re:European Court of Human Rights bans weakening of secure e...
by 0dayz on Thursday February 15, 2024 @08:51AM
(#39382669)
Here's the actual position accord to the commission:
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-9-2023-00166...
Re:European Court of Human Rights bans weakening of secure e...
by miohtama on Thursday February 15, 2024 @12:01PM
(#39385131)
As it is Ylva Johansson, the hater of freedom of speech and the champion of scanning software companies, speaking in this document, here is her background:
https://balkaninsight.com/2023/09/25/who-benefits-inside-the...
Re:European Court of Human Rights bans weakening of secure e...
by gpderetta on Wednesday February 14, 2024 @12:17PM
(#39372367)
They in fact cannot.
Re:European Court of Human Rights bans weakening of secure e...
by moffkalast on Wednesday February 14, 2024 @01:15PM
(#39373121)
Ursula on suicide watch.