Re:Alaska Airlines flight 1282 NTSB preliminary report [pdf]
by peteradio on Tuesday February 06, 2024 @08:07PM
(#39283188)
Spirit has no competition. How do you threaten the supplier who owns your production when you have no other options?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Alaska Airlines flight 1282 NTSB preliminary report [pdf]
by bzax on Tuesday February 06, 2024 @08:29PM
(#39283356)
It sure would be great if they just owned the supplier outright and could align incentives that way.
Re:Alaska Airlines flight 1282 NTSB preliminary report [pdf]
by Rapzid on Tuesday February 06, 2024 @10:09PM
(#39283979)
That you Dave Calhoun? I guess your replacement will figure it out and let us know.
Seriously though, that's a problem people getting paid sh* tons of money are supposed to be on top of.
Re:Alaska Airlines flight 1282 NTSB preliminary report [pdf]
by mlindner on Tuesday February 06, 2024 @11:19PM
(#39284453)
These sorts of what I like to call "reverse monopolies" are all over the place in US industry now. So many companies dumped out pieces of themselves to a single company that then supplies for all of them, removing the ability of those companies to actually compete with each other by differentiation.
Re:Alaska Airlines flight 1282 NTSB preliminary report [pdf]
by sofixa on Wednesday February 07, 2024 @04:30AM
(#39286412)
Considering we're talking about Boeing, who actually do the work Spirit does for them for the 737 for other airframes (making the fuselages), and used to do it in house for the 737 before too (in that same Wichita factory complex where Spirit is now, Spirit being the result of Boeing's monumentally stupid decision to divest), I think it's fair to say that Boeing can bring production back in house.