Re:Lucidrains/self-rewarding-lm-PyTorch: Self-Rewarding Lang...
by azinman2 on Thursday January 25, 2024 @02:40AM
(#39127200)
I assume this doesn’t yet run on llama.cpp?
Re:Lucidrains/self-rewarding-lm-PyTorch: Self-Rewarding Lang...
by lhl on Thursday January 25, 2024 @04:17AM
(#39127689)
here are some GGUFs https://huggingface.co/brittlewis12/Snorkel-Mistral-PairRM-D...
Re:Lucidrains/self-rewarding-lm-PyTorch: Self-Rewarding Lang...
by tarruda on Thursday January 25, 2024 @03:54AM
(#39127568)
It is based on Mistral which llama.cpp supports, so I assume it does run (you might need to convert to GGUF format and quantize it).
Re:Lucidrains/self-rewarding-lm-PyTorch: Self-Rewarding Lang...
by mark_l_watson on Thursday January 25, 2024 @06:14AM
(#39128338)
Thanks for this, and the link you provided below for GGUF files! I just cleared my schedule this afternoon to kick the tires.
Re:Lucidrains/self-rewarding-lm-PyTorch: Self-Rewarding Lang...
by spidersenses on Thursday January 25, 2024 @09:32AM
(#39129948)
>Snorkel-Mistral-PairRM-DPO
The naming of these models is getting ridiculous...
Re:Lucidrains/self-rewarding-lm-PyTorch: Self-Rewarding Lang...
by column on Thursday January 25, 2024 @10:31AM
(#39130565)
I kind of disagree. It's not "user friendly" but it is very descriptive. They are codenames afterall. Take "dolphin-2.6-mistral-7b-dpo-laser" for instance : with a little LLM background knowledge, just from the name you know it is a 7 billion parameters model based on Mistral, with a filtered dataset to remove alignment and bias (dolphin), version 2.6 and using the techniques described in the Direct Preference Optimization (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.18290.pdf) and Laser (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2312.13558.pdf) papers to improve its output.
Re:Lucidrains/self-rewarding-lm-PyTorch: Self-Rewarding Lang...
by salad-tycoon on Thursday January 25, 2024 @11:35AM
(#39131398)
And here I was thinking they were somehow using the first three words from my Bitcoin wallet.
Re:Lucidrains/self-rewarding-lm-PyTorch: Self-Rewarding Lang...
by spidersenses on Thursday January 25, 2024 @10:55AM
(#39130871)
Thank you for a great and informative explanation despite my somewhat ignorant take.
I'm an occasional visitor to huggingface, so I'm actually superficially familiar with the taxonomy. I just felt like, even if I tried to satirize it, I wouldn't be able to come up with a crazier name. And that's not even the end of the Cambrian explosion of LLMs.
* Announcement: https://twitter.com/billyuchenlin/status/1749975138307825933
* Model Card: https://huggingface.co/snorkelai/Snorkel-Mistral-PairRM-DPO
* Response Re-Ranker: https://huggingface.co/llm-blender/PairRM
"We would also like to acknowledge contemporary work published independently on arXiv on 2024-01-18 by Meta & NYU (Yuan, et al) in a paper called Self-Rewarding Language Models, which proposes a similar general approach for creating alignment pairs from a larger set of candidate responses, but using the LLM as the reward model. While this may work for general-purpose models, our experience has shown that task-specific reward models guided by SMEs are necessary for most enterprise applications of LLMs for specific use cases, which is why we focus on the use of external reward models."