The artifacts are extremely an issue for artists who don't want their images damaged for the possibility of them not being trained by AI.

It's a bad tradeoff.

Nightshaded images aren't intended for portfolios. They're mean to be uploaded enmasse and scraped later.

To where? A place no one sees them and they aren't scraped?

I think the point is that they're akin to a watermark.

Even before the current AI boom, plenty of artists have wanted to showcase their work/prove that it exists without necessarily making the highest quality original file public.

Most serious artists I know (at least in my community) release their high-quality images on Patreon or similar.

For example in accounts on image sites that are exposed to suspected scrapers but not to others. Scrapers will still see the real data, but they'll also run into stuff designed to mix up the training process.

do you mean scrapped or scraped?

scraped

> The artifacts are a non-issue.

According to which authority?