Re:Remote work doesn't seem to affect productivity, Fed stud...
by zer0tonin on Thursday January 18, 2024 @10:09AM
(#39042601)
15 * 2 minutes a day 5 times a week is 100h+ by the end of the year
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Remote work doesn't seem to affect productivity, Fed stud...
by pc86 on Thursday January 18, 2024 @11:11AM
(#39043501)
It's 1.4% of the year (assuming that 130 hours a year is correct I didn't check it). That's less than two ounces out of a gallon of liquid or less than half a centimeter out of a foot.
In what other things is 1.4% considered "significant?"
Re:Remote work doesn't seem to affect productivity, Fed stud...
by dgfitz on Thursday January 18, 2024 @12:15PM
(#39044439)
Taxes jump to mind. COL adjustments vs inflation for the past few years also comes to mind. Beating some measurable world record by 1.4% is probably a big deal. I'm sure there are more examples if you look for them.
Re:Remote work doesn't seem to affect productivity, Fed stud...
by helboi4 on Friday January 19, 2024 @05:01AM
(#39053638)
Bro nobody is spending 100% of their time being productive. we have to have transitional time. time going from one place to another is a net benefit because living in one box is anti-human. for me the cost of the time is so so worth it because i feel so much better seeing my colleagues in person. i become a shell of myself if i don't leave the house so losing the time is something i'm very okay with. its such a small amount of time to make my life 200x better.
Re:Remote work doesn't seem to affect productivity, Fed stud...
by miroljub on Thursday January 18, 2024 @11:47AM
(#39044037)
You can read 10 books during that time. It's not like you need to sit there, do nothing and intensively hate your life 2 * 15 minutes a day.