News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:FAA grounds B737 Max 9 for the time being by kilroy123 on Saturday January 13, 2024 @09:17AM (#38980100)
I strongly agree. I fly a lot, far more than the average person. So I have a lot of preferences for which plane I'm sitting on.

Not surprisingly, it is originally from Bombardier.

The US, no the world, desperately needs more competition and other plane builders.

Re:FAA grounds B737 Max 9 for the time being by noir_lord on Saturday January 13, 2024 @10:44AM (#38980950)
My favourite commercial flight was on a 787, that was one comfortable plane to fly on (they pressurise to a lower altitude than anything else I’d flown commercial) but every other flight I’ve got in the top ten was airbus.

Given the choice though I’d fly on an airbus with lower passenger comfort than any recent Boeing.

I never used to look at what aircraft it was but now I do and I avoid Boeing, that’s a strategic failure, don’t make customers think is a good rule.

Re:FAA grounds B737 Max 9 for the time being by naijaboiler on Saturday January 13, 2024 @01:52PM (#38983196)
Same here for me. 787 has the best flying customer experience. After that, the rest of the top 10 are airbuses
Re:FAA grounds B737 Max 9 for the time being by lierborgu on Saturday January 13, 2024 @09:24AM (#38980165)
I think maybe it's the A220 (developed by Bombardier, acquired by Airbus) you're thinking about here, not the A320neo (developed by Airbus)
Re:FAA grounds B737 Max 9 for the time being by Symbiote on Saturday January 13, 2024 @09:22AM (#38980142)
The originally-Bombardier plane is the A220.

The A320 / A320neo has nothing to do with Bombardier.

Re:FAA grounds B737 Max 9 for the time being by atif089 on Saturday January 13, 2024 @11:24AM (#38981413)
Anyone got any idea what's the status of that X1 thingy which was supposed to be like Concord fast but still affordable by peasant class
Re:FAA grounds B737 Max 9 for the time being by afruitpie on Saturday January 13, 2024 @12:19PM (#38982095)
Are you thinking of Boom Supersonic?

I know next to nothing about aviation or economics, but my gut feeling is a plane with ~80 seats for international flights will be expensive.

https://boomsupersonic.com/

Re:FAA grounds B737 Max 9 for the time being by atif089 on Saturday January 13, 2024 @02:56PM (#38983880)
Yup, boom supersonic indeed. I remember reading somewhere that they were also working on a ~200 capacity model
Re:FAA grounds B737 Max 9 for the time being by wolverine876 on Saturday January 13, 2024 @01:16PM (#38982795)
> ~80 seats for international flights will be expensive.

Also, it sounds like a lot of GHG emissions per passenger-mile.