News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Value of life by pc86 on Monday January 08, 2024 @09:44AM (#38912614)
Are you 2x as likely to become a paraplegic after a motor vehicle accident at 30mph as you are to die? That doesn't sound right.

> fewer people traveling

I don't think anyone says to themselves "it's a 20mph zone on the route so I'm not going, if it was 30 I would go." Lower speed limit != fewer travelers.

> less air population

Assuming you meant pollution, the same amount of cars going slower would cause more pollution in a given area, not less.

> people having more time to meditate

I'm sorry what? Most people don't meditate, and how is sitting in the car longer going to give you more time to meditate?

Re:Value of life by Jyaif on Tuesday January 09, 2024 @12:41PM (#38929135)
> Lower speed limit != fewer travelers

Longer travel times result in fewer people wanting to travel. Was not expecting this to be controversial.

> The same amount of cars going slower would cause more pollution in a given area

Drag is proportional to the square of the velocity

> Most people don't meditate, and how is sitting in the car longer going to give you more time to meditate?

Meditate is perhaps the wrong word.

Re:Value of life by tonyedgecombe on Tuesday January 09, 2024 @03:59PM (#38932031)
>Assuming you meant pollution, the same amount of cars going slower would cause more pollution in a given area, not less

In general the slower you drive the lower your mpg (and hence pollution).