News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple pays out over claims it deliberately slowed down iP... by giorgioz on Monday January 08, 2024 @09:15AM (#38912181)
Does anyone have any idea how the slowdown was implemented? What was the literal if conditions to cause the slowdowns? Was it

if battery cycles > x then slowdown y%

OR

if currente date > 2020 then slowdown y%

OR something else?

Re:Apple pays out over claims it deliberately slowed down iP... by acdha on Monday January 08, 2024 @09:24AM (#38912294)
It only kicked in under certain conditions so I’d bet it was based on monitoring current battery output. I had a phone affected by it and first noticed the problem in the winter when cold temperatures meant it was relatively easy to trigger outdoors but it still never happened indoors.
Re:Apple pays out over claims it deliberately slowed down iP... by alpaca128 on Tuesday January 09, 2024 @05:45AM (#38924571)
It's based on battery performance. So technically correct, they just didn't inform users about it which in the end had the exact same effect as if Apple deliberately slowed down phones in order to raise sales. Effectively it was planned obsolescence with (more or less) plausible deniability.
Re:Apple pays out over claims it deliberately slowed down iP... by madeofpalk on Tuesday January 09, 2024 @06:06AM (#38924722)
if battery voltage < 80% then slowdown y%
Re:Apple pays out over claims it deliberately slowed down iP... by thebruce87m on Tuesday January 09, 2024 @06:19AM (#38924818)
As I understand it, it kicked in after the first brownout.