Re:Boeing wants FAA to exempt MAX 7 from safety rules to get...
by TylerE on Friday January 05, 2024 @03:35PM
(#38884536)
For that matter there are still plenty of DC-3s in active service, and those are all over 80 years old at this point. Not nearly as big a deal as it might sound - the biggest wear item on a commercial plane is actually cabin pressurization due to the long term fatigue characteristics of aluminum. DC=3s aren't pressurized.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Boeing wants FAA to exempt MAX 7 from safety rules to get...
by nradov on Friday January 05, 2024 @03:42PM
(#38884619)
I'm asking about changing policies for newly manufactured airliners, not specific airplanes that have already been built. No one has used a DC-3 for FAA Part 121 scheduled airline service in decades.
Re:Boeing wants FAA to exempt MAX 7 from safety rules to get...
by TylerE on Friday January 05, 2024 @04:20PM
(#38885104)
There are a number in regular commercial use (including passenger flights) in Canada which is a very similar regulatory regime. There are multiple US operators of the Basler turboprop conversion.