Re:Oracle-samples/sd4j: Stable Diffusion pipeline in Java us...
by genman on Monday January 01, 2024 @04:46PM
(#38835620)
Of course. If this was my intent, I would have also replied to the comments. I was just curious about the massive phenomena rapidly appearing under this post.
In addition I'm also frightened if the same anti-Java bias prohibits similarly interesting content to appear on the front page.
Re:Oracle-samples/sd4j: Stable Diffusion pipeline in Java us...
by dang on Monday January 01, 2024 @06:36PM
(#38836350)
HN discusses plenty of interesting Java content and you're certainly welcome to post more!
https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&qu...
https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&qu...
Re:Oracle-samples/sd4j: Stable Diffusion pipeline in Java us...
by pvg on Monday January 01, 2024 @05:35PM
(#38835949)
These are all fine motivations but they make threads worse not better by starting unrelated meta flamewars, especially when written in a goading tone (crybabies, etc). The way to make crappy threads better is to downvote and flag lame comments and by writing on-topic, nonmeta comments.
If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be grateful.