First new U.S. nuclear reactor since 2016 is now in operation

Re:First new U.S. nuclear reactor since 2016 is now in opera... by goodpoint on Thursday December 28, 2023 @08:59AM (#38793522)

This is pure whataboutism.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:First new U.S. nuclear reactor since 2016 is now in opera... by goodpoint on Thursday December 28, 2023 @12:08PM (#38795601)

Silent downvotes, nice. The amount of nuclear shilling here...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:First new U.S. nuclear reactor since 2016 is now in opera... by dang on Friday December 29, 2023 @02:57PM (#38809482)

Your comments are getting downvoted because they're breaking the site guidelines. Can you please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and stick to them instead? We'd appreciate it. Note these:

"When disagreeing, please reply to the argument instead of calling names. 'That is idiotic; 1 + 1 is 2, not 3' can be shortened to '1 + 1 is 2, not 3."

"Omit internet tropes"

"Please don't post insinuations about astroturfing, shilling, brigading, foreign agents, and the like. It degrades discussion and is usually mistaken"

"Please don't comment about the voting on comments. It never does any good, and it makes boring reading."

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:First new U.S. nuclear reactor since 2016 is now in opera... by Fatnino on Thursday December 28, 2023 @12:38PM (#38795996)

So is bitching about nuclear while ignoring the much worse coal.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:First new U.S. nuclear reactor since 2016 is now in opera... by edgyquant on Thursday December 28, 2023 @01:42PM (#38796906)

No one is ignoring coal lmao

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:First new U.S. nuclear reactor since 2016 is now in opera... by imtringued on Friday December 29, 2023 @08:46AM (#38804805)

People complaining about nuclear power are mostly concerned with cost and time needed for construction and no loosening regulations is not an option.

[ Parent | on HN ]