News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Did English ever have a formal version of "you"? (2011) by k__ on Sunday December 24, 2023 @02:03PM (#38755730)
In German, we use "sie" the German equivalent of "they".

Thus, to be polite, you address someone as many people that aren't part of the conversation.

Re:Did English ever have a formal version of "you"? (2011) by Tomte on Sunday December 24, 2023 @02:10PM (#38755796)
No, it's "Sie", not "sie", and therefore not identical to third person.
Re:Did English ever have a formal version of "you"? (2011) by vidarh on Sunday December 24, 2023 @03:29PM (#38756570)
This is a minor distinction to make it clear in writing, same as De vs de in Norwegian, and several other languages. It's a common way of turning a plural into a formal address.

Incidentally, in Norwegian the formal form is now so archaic that short of communicating very formally with a very old person, in most cases it will come across as rude and sarcastic (you're implying someone is seriously up themselves)

Re:Did English ever have a formal version of "you"? (2011) by aqme28 on Sunday December 24, 2023 @02:21PM (#38755920)
Not to be confused with "sie", which means "she"
Re:Did English ever have a formal version of "you"? (2011) by konschubert on Sunday December 24, 2023 @02:20PM (#38755904)
That’s just spelling.
Re:Did English ever have a formal version of "you"? (2011) by atoav on Sunday December 24, 2023 @03:17PM (#38756467)
In a German sentence a change in capitalization of Sie can very well turn a "formal you" (Sie) into a more general "them" (sie). So it is not just spelling, although it is a very common mistake.
Re:Did English ever have a formal version of "you"? (2011) by sinkasapa on Sunday December 24, 2023 @02:16PM (#38755867)
This is why the British and people in the US do not act the same. The British have their behaviour while us Americans have our behavior. Totally different.
Re:Did English ever have a formal version of "you"? (2011) by lnxg33k1 on Sunday December 24, 2023 @02:11PM (#38755809)
The same is in italian “lei”, except during fascism where they introduced as a formal way to address someone as “voi” which would be the plural of “tu”/“voi”
Re:Did English ever have a formal version of "you"? (2011) by 082349872349872 on Sunday December 24, 2023 @02:15PM (#38755862)
Did they not like the feminine connection between "lei" and "Lei"? Or what was the motivation?
Re:Did English ever have a formal version of "you"? (2011) by lnxg33k1 on Sunday December 24, 2023 @02:43PM (#38756143)
Afaik it was because the “Lei” was considered elitist and because in the roman latin culture they had only the “tu” up to caesar introduced the “voi”, so maybe you know fascists had some sort of fetish for the roman empire so they chose to bring the culture as close as possible closer to what roman culture was
Re:Did English ever have a formal version of "you"? (2011) by NewsyHacker on Sunday December 24, 2023 @03:24PM (#38756528)
Caesar didn't "introduce the voi". Is this an urban myth that Italians believe? The tu/vous distinction in Romance languages arose in medieval times. Not only did it not exist in Caesar's time, it is absent from the centuries of Imperial-era literature in Latin.

There is a wide literature on Latin forms of address. Eleanor Dickey's monograph published by Oxford University Press is a good survey.

Re:Did English ever have a formal version of "you"? (2011) by lnxg33k1 on Sunday December 24, 2023 @03:54PM (#38756746)
I am not an historian but it seems so, I’ve found in the past few minutes two sources that attribute Voi to romans, its in italian but sure it can be translated, going to paste the original links unaltered

https://www.elisamotterle.com/galateo-del-tu-del-lei-e-del-v...

https://www.treccani.it/magazine/atlante/cultura/Diamoci_del...

Beware the treccani is the most used/influential encyclopaedia in italy, so I’d tend to say that i trust them a lot

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treccani

Re:Did English ever have a formal version of "you"? (2011) by NewsyHacker on Sunday December 24, 2023 @03:57PM (#38756774)
Your first link backs up exactly what I mentioned above:

> In antichità, quando si parlava latino, le formule di cortesia non esistevano … L’usanza del Voi nasce insieme a una nuova formula politica: la tetrarchia introdotta nel 293 da Diocleziano.

It was an innovation in Romance that took place centuries after Caesar and most of the Imperial era. Again, there is ample scholarly literature on this, so no need to resort to popular references like encyclopedias.

Re:Did English ever have a formal version of "you"? (2011) by lnxg33k1 on Sunday December 24, 2023 @04:01PM (#38756819)
Yeah I saw that, but I'd say if that makes sense, that they're attributing the introduction of "Voi" within the roman era and not in the medieval times, right? The second one instead attributes it to "Roma Cesarea", to be fair, it is not the encyclopaedia that attributes it to "Roma Cesarea" but the article that influenced Mussolini quoted on the article on the encyclopaedia, so they're probably only quoting, but I don't know enough, so I'd trust you're right, thank you
Re:Did English ever have a formal version of "you"? (2011) by NewsyHacker on Sunday December 24, 2023 @04:07PM (#38756866)
Historians today tend to trace the ultimate fall of the Roman Empire to the multiple crises of the third century, even if the name of the empire limped on for a couple of centuries more. So AD 293 is quite a late date, on the threshold to a new era. From the viewpoint of modern historians, it is hard to understand how Italian Fascism could have seen anything that late as worth being proud of and emulating.
Re:Did English ever have a formal version of "you"? (2011) by ffgjgf1 on Sunday December 24, 2023 @04:43PM (#38757162)
> trace the ultimate fall of the Roman Empire to

Or the plague and the subsequent Arab invasions. The empire was rebounded several times from near collapse after the 300s

Re:Did English ever have a formal version of "you"? (2011) by NewsyHacker on Sunday December 24, 2023 @04:50PM (#38757238)
The Western Empire was the only Roman Empire that the Italian Fascists ever really cared about. Early Byzantium was totally foreign to their mythology.
Re:Did English ever have a formal version of "you"? (2011) by 082349872349872 on Sunday December 24, 2023 @04:09PM (#38756883)
It's much easier to understand if one doesn't assume that Fascism ever cared about academic truth.
Re:Did English ever have a formal version of "you"? (2011) by lnxg33k1 on Sunday December 24, 2023 @04:16PM (#38756937)
Probably you're right, they just needed something widely known to make people feel some sort of national identity/united/proud and control them better
Re:Did English ever have a formal version of "you"? (2011) by 082349872349872 on Sunday December 24, 2023 @02:11PM (#38755813)
It makes sense to me: high ranking people often have conversations which are on the behalf (or at least implicate the future) of large groups of people. Thus a plural formal second person, as well as the "royal we".

(note that english aristocrats were often spoken of, not by given [or if they had one, family] name, but by the geographical entity that was the basis of their nobility)

Re:Did English ever have a formal version of "you"? (2011) by yurishimo on Sunday December 24, 2023 @02:09PM (#38755785)
Dutch is similar with “U” being both singular and plural. Verb conjugation is the same for both cases.

This has been interesting as an English speaker learning Dutch! Luckily I never really latched on to sms-speak but I can imagine some cohorts of English speakers have to break the habit of reading “u” as shorthand for the the full word.

Re:Did English ever have a formal version of "you"? (2011) by JW_00000 on Sunday December 24, 2023 @02:46PM (#38756168)
This lead me down a short Wikipedia rabbit-hole that is quite interesting (at least to me).

Apparently Dutch originally had "du" as 2nd person singular and "gij" as 2nd person plural. From the 16th century, "gij" started being used as singular polite form. (Possibly under the influence of Latin and French.) Later, "du" disappeared. Up to this point, the progression is similar to English.

"gij" then transformed to "jij" in the northern part of the Dutch language area and in written language; while it remained "gij" in Flemish spoken language.

However, then in the 17th century people started using "Uwe Edelheit" ("Your Nobility") as a new formal form in letters. This evolved into the current formal pronoun "u".

(Note also that the accusative form of "gij" is also "u", but is not related to the formal "u".)

Sources: https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gij, https://etymologiebank.nl/trefwoord/gij, https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/U_(voornaamwoord), https://etymologiebank.nl/trefwoord/u

Re:Did English ever have a formal version of "you"? (2011) by native_dirch on Sunday December 24, 2023 @07:50PM (#38758548)
Native Dutch speaker here. These days one doesn't capitalise the "u" except at the start of a sentence, however in older texts (40+ years?) it was usual to see the "U" pronoun capitalised at all times. Sorry if I'm mansplaining but I noticed you capitalising it and thought I'd point it out, because it would stand out to a modern Dutch reader.

As for sms-speak, I'd be flabbergasted if you encountered the u-form anywhere in text messages except maybe in automated OTP messages from your bank. So I would guess that's something you needn't worry about :).

Good luck in your language-learning journey. Assuming you're living in the Netherlands, I'm curious as to how your integration is going? My observation is that Dutch culture can be insanely hard for foreigners to get a foothold in, partly because of the "polite" tendency of most locals to insist on speaking English around non-native Dutch. I feel like that gesture, which may seem accommodating on the surface level, can almost be an exclusionary dynamic in itself.

Re:Did English ever have a formal version of "you"? (2011) by yurishimo on Tuesday December 26, 2023 @03:24PM (#38775679)
Hey! I think you created an account just to reply to comment. That's cool!

Appreciate the spelling tip. I make a lot of mistakes writing in Dutch as it is. I would likely keep doing that by instinct until someone told me.

I am in the Netherlands for just over a year now. I live in a small village near the Belgian border and work in Eindhoven. I've actually found my neighbors and coworkers very accommodating towards my efforts to learn your language. I've taken 90 hours of lessons in about 9 months, which made me more confident to push people more and challenge myself. At my job, I try not to speak English for social situations, although all of our work is done in English due to remote workers in other countries.

Although I've had a good experience, I can see how some less assertive immigrants might not feel empowered to ask others honor their social requests. There have been times that I asked for something in Dutch, and without any hesitation, the attendant or store worker responded to my request in English. That stings a bit, but it stings for my ego because it doesn't usually happen. Many Dutch people in my daily life ask me to repeat myself, but they don't automatically make an assumption about my preferences and instead rely on the clues of the conversation to guide their responses. All of this is also dependent on the situation, eg. for work tasks, I speak English, because miscommunication is not an option.

If someone is reading this also as a new NL immigrant, I would say you should be assertive and ask a little on your path to find friends. It's okay to make friends in one language and transition to another if you both speak it. Shopping should be done in Dutch, read the Dutch newspaper, etc etc. Put in the effort and many Dutchmen will respect that. Habit might let their tongue slip, but kindly and firmly remind them, and they'll go back.

For Dutchies, I would say that that it's probably worth the effort to make a friend. If not, consider it the new normal for politeness. Just try to keep going in the same language until visible confusion or a blocking of progress in the conversation.

If you don't mind, I'd love if you reached out and sent me an email! I'd love to keep chatting about it. Address is in my profile.

Re:Did English ever have a formal version of "you"? (2011) by ribs on Sunday December 24, 2023 @02:11PM (#38755817)
Like in Spanish, where the formal second-person pronouns are the same as the third-person pronouns.
Re:Did English ever have a formal version of "you"? (2011) by k__ on Sunday December 24, 2023 @02:30PM (#38756015)
What about ellos/ellas?
Re:Did English ever have a formal version of "you"? (2011) by trealira on Sunday December 24, 2023 @08:20PM (#38758691)
I think they mean that the verb conjugations for the plural third person (ellos/ellas) and the formal plural second person (ustedes) are the same.
Re:Did English ever have a formal version of "you"? (2011) by MrsPeaches on Sunday December 24, 2023 @06:21PM (#38758027)
Some fun archaic ones on German[1]

Interesting to see the use of “Er” as a put down.

[1] https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Höflichkeitsform