News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Did English ever have a formal version of "you"? (2011) by Tomte on Sunday December 24, 2023 @02:10PM (#38755796)
No, it's "Sie", not "sie", and therefore not identical to third person.
Re:Did English ever have a formal version of "you"? (2011) by vidarh on Sunday December 24, 2023 @03:29PM (#38756570)
This is a minor distinction to make it clear in writing, same as De vs de in Norwegian, and several other languages. It's a common way of turning a plural into a formal address.

Incidentally, in Norwegian the formal form is now so archaic that short of communicating very formally with a very old person, in most cases it will come across as rude and sarcastic (you're implying someone is seriously up themselves)

Re:Did English ever have a formal version of "you"? (2011) by aqme28 on Sunday December 24, 2023 @02:21PM (#38755920)
Not to be confused with "sie", which means "she"
Re:Did English ever have a formal version of "you"? (2011) by konschubert on Sunday December 24, 2023 @02:20PM (#38755904)
That’s just spelling.
Re:Did English ever have a formal version of "you"? (2011) by atoav on Sunday December 24, 2023 @03:17PM (#38756467)
In a German sentence a change in capitalization of Sie can very well turn a "formal you" (Sie) into a more general "them" (sie). So it is not just spelling, although it is a very common mistake.
Re:Did English ever have a formal version of "you"? (2011) by sinkasapa on Sunday December 24, 2023 @02:16PM (#38755867)
This is why the British and people in the US do not act the same. The British have their behaviour while us Americans have our behavior. Totally different.