Re:Did English ever have a formal version of "you"? (2011)
by Tomte on Sunday December 24, 2023 @02:10PM
(#38755796)
No, it's "Sie", not "sie", and therefore not identical to third person.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Did English ever have a formal version of "you"? (2011)
by vidarh on Sunday December 24, 2023 @03:29PM
(#38756570)
This is a minor distinction to make it clear in writing, same as De vs de in Norwegian, and several other languages. It's a common way of turning a plural into a formal address.
Incidentally, in Norwegian the formal form is now so archaic that short of communicating very formally with a very old person, in most cases it will come across as rude and sarcastic (you're implying someone is seriously up themselves)
Re:Did English ever have a formal version of "you"? (2011)
by aqme28 on Sunday December 24, 2023 @02:21PM
(#38755920)
Not to be confused with "sie", which means "she"
Re:Did English ever have a formal version of "you"? (2011)
by konschubert on Sunday December 24, 2023 @02:20PM
(#38755904)
That’s just spelling.
Re:Did English ever have a formal version of "you"? (2011)
by atoav on Sunday December 24, 2023 @03:17PM
(#38756467)
In a German sentence a change in capitalization of Sie can very well turn a "formal you" (Sie) into a more general "them" (sie). So it is not just spelling, although it is a very common mistake.