Re:Meta censors pro-Palestinian views on a global scale, rep...
by anigbrowl on Sunday December 24, 2023 @12:06AM
(#38751296)
I'm fine with that. Looking at a map I see plenty of room for 2 states to exist; nobody is going to get everything they want.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Meta censors pro-Palestinian views on a global scale, rep...
by krembo on Sunday December 24, 2023 @02:55AM
(#38751977)
Ha ha. The 2 states solution in a land smaller than ny? Remind you who was chasing that since 48 and who always preferred the war and fight? Well, the latter is the side that keeps losing for a good reason.
"When peace comes we will perhaps in time be able to forgive the Arabs for killing our sons, but it will be harder for us to forgive them for having forced us to kill their sons. Peace will come when the Arabs will love their children more than they hate us." - Golda Meir
Re:Meta censors pro-Palestinian views on a global scale, rep...
by baobabKoodaa on Sunday December 24, 2023 @05:32AM
(#38752557)
Plenty of room where exactly? On one side of the map is the river, on the other side of the map is the sea, and you want free Palestina to get the land "from the river to the sea".
Re:Meta censors pro-Palestinian views on a global scale, rep...
by anigbrowl on Sunday December 24, 2023 @06:13PM
(#38757963)
As I said, neither side will get all that they want. Taking slogans as literal negotiation positions isn't realistic. All wars end in compromises even when one side capitulates.
Re:Meta censors pro-Palestinian views on a global scale, rep...
by baobabKoodaa on Sunday December 24, 2023 @06:20PM
(#38758016)
Fair enough