News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How to make LLMs go fast by throwup238 on Friday December 22, 2023 @05:03PM (#38739203)
> feels a lot more like how actual human memory works

Beware of feel-good traps like this.

If you were to map the human connectome to a computational neural network down to the ion channel, it'd be at least 500 quadrillion parameters*. That's at least 5-6 orders of magnitude beyond what is currently possible with SOTA ML which means that even if the human brain was 99% devoted to compressing those tokens, that 1% that could actually do work with them is still a thousand times bigger than GPT4. There be emergent dragons.

* This is a fascile argument to begin with since biological neuron signals aren't quantized and ion channels are far too complex to map to a single static parameter

Re:How to make LLMs go fast by bbor on Friday December 22, 2023 @08:26PM (#38740787)
Maybe against HN rules, but: thank you. Very helpful comment!
Re:How to make LLMs go fast by fwip on Friday December 22, 2023 @06:00PM (#38739617)
> biological neuron signals aren't quantized

Perhaps, but they inherently have imprecision due the nature of being biological. Expose the same neuron to the same input N times, and you'll get a range of output. The effect of noisy analog data is, broadly speaking, similar to the effect of low-resolution digital data.

Re:How to make LLMs go fast by throwup238 on Saturday December 23, 2023 @03:34AM (#38742611)
Expose the same neuron to the same input N times and you won't get a randomly distributed range of outputs, you'll get a signal that is either attenuated or potentiated. That's not noise, that's the simplest form of neuroplasticity at work (which is why static parameters can never represent ion channels).