Re:Wasmer JavaScript SDK
by theplatman on Thursday December 21, 2023 @04:13PM
(#38727019)
I would say that this landing page on your company’s website is unnecessarily trashing wasmtime in the headline
Re:Wasmer JavaScript SDK
by syrusakbary on Thursday December 21, 2023 @04:27PM
(#38727212)
No intend of trashing (in marketing pages titles tend to be more flashy).
In any case I just updated it. Happy holidays!
Re:Wasmer JavaScript SDK
by aleksiy123 on Thursday December 21, 2023 @04:40PM
(#38727378)
Is it just me or is it weird to show a faster startup speed as a bigger bar?
I thought it was slower until I saw the 1000x. Even 1000x seems kinda meaningless.
Preaching water, drinking wine.
Classic.
Re:Wasmer JavaScript SDK
by throwawaysugar on Thursday December 21, 2023 @09:57PM
(#38730433)
None of those are actual answers to the criticism posted by the parent, so it's hard to really care even if it's wrapped around a loving tone.
Happy holidays to you as well!
Re:Wasmer JavaScript SDK
by syrusakbary on Friday December 22, 2023 @05:05AM
(#38732734)
Thanks!
I sometimes assume people have the same context as I do, and your comment made me realize that it was not the case. Here's some context: https://wasmer.io/posts/wasmer-and-trademarks
Regarding standards, I assume the mention is referring to Wasmer push for WASIX [1]. Which is a specification & implementation that welcomes anyone to participate (even on it's governance model), so I don't think the stance of the previous comment is accurate.
This is not a zero-sum game.
If you find Wasmer useful, use it! If you don’t and you prefer others, feel free to use them. There are plenty of choices.
Happy holidays!