Re:Waymo significantly outperforms comparable human benchmar...
by jvanderbot on Wednesday December 20, 2023 @12:56PM
(#38711507)
This can be said for taxis as well, though, right? What's the difference?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Waymo significantly outperforms comparable human benchmar...
by wongarsu on Wednesday December 20, 2023 @12:59PM
(#38711558)
Uber tries that, but it turns out in many places you can't offer human-driven taxis much cheaper once you put them on equal footing regarding insurance and other relevant regulations and stop running the service at a loss.
Re:Waymo significantly outperforms comparable human benchmar...
by tyre on Wednesday December 20, 2023 @01:00PM
(#38711573)
No need to pay a human and fewer total cars because they can operate mostly 24hr/day
Re:Waymo significantly outperforms comparable human benchmar...
by roywiggins on Wednesday December 20, 2023 @04:34PM
(#38713939)
Can't taxis already operate 24hrs a day? Just rotate out the drivers.
Re:Waymo significantly outperforms comparable human benchmar...
by bluGill on Thursday December 21, 2023 @04:24PM
(#38727173)
They can, but nobody wants a ride except drunks. Which is one reason why taxis look so bad: when a significant portion of your clients are drunk (throwing up in the back, peeing on the seats and all the other things they do) you don't want a nice car. Nice taxis don't work those shifts. If there is a big shared car market (I doubt it) you will see cars for different times of the day as a profile for potential drunk rider.