Well, if the donor isn't going to inventory the goods, then expectations should be low. Did his nephew not have a clue?
This is like never checking the data backup. Either it's not that valuable, or you're negligent.
[0] https://www.mlive.com/news/detroit/2011/06/report_ernie_harw...
But at the same time, you're supposed to do your research to make sure the institution you want to donate your collection to has the capability and capacity to properly care for it and make it both secure and accessible.
Just because it's a local library doesn't mean they can.
Humans have created an absurd number of artifacts and what’s valuable isn’t the items but the time spent studying them. Just dumping a collection on someone isn’t doing them any favors, just handing them an obligation.
Even though the museum is accessible only by appointment, it still actively adds to its collection and happily accepts donations (though only so long as they can supplied with appropriate documentation and have been correctly preserved) because they have potential research value in the future. The museum's collection was fundamental in discovering that DDT was affecting birds, for example.
Even though it's technically a museum, I think it can be helpful to think of it as an archive that can be used to pinpoint changes (to genetics, toxin exposures, early human technology, etc.) across time and across the landscape.
I think most major natural history museums will probably have large collections of specimens/artifacts that are intended strictly for research, not for the public to ever see. The small portion of the collection that is on display is fantastic fundraising, but public displays are not the only purpose (or even the main purpose) that a museum like the Smithsonian serves.
This is a very different use case from a baseball memorabilia collection, however, which has little value outside of being displayed to the public. I can see how such donations can end up being a white elephant gift.
Bad premise.
How many municipal LIBRARIES have you been to that displayed sports memorabilia?
We're not talking about a museum, sports or otherwise.
A lot of towns have one or more mini-museums of that sort. They might be attached to a library, to city hall, to a school, or even a volunteer organization or something.
Donating it to a library can make perfect sense in that case. It really depends on the library.
If materials don't circulate, they don't belong at the library. When materials circulate a lot, they wear out and need to be repaired and eventually replaced.
Sarcasm?
I think I assumed you were using the term "core business" sarcastically... maybe I'm just used to so much snark on HN and the internet in general that now I'm seeing it when it's not there. :S
Never mind, sorry for the confusion!
He became the guy to call when a retired player needed money or the one the widow called when a player passed away. He amassed a huge collection, second only to the Baseball Hall of Fame. At the end of his life he faced with what to do with his collection. His favorite nephew worked for the Detroit Public library and convinced him to leave it to them in his will so he did.
At the time he passed away the library had closed most of its branches and was terribly understaffed. They made the collection viewable by appointment only. In the first six months one or more of those viewers walked out the door with the most valuable items and sold them on the black market to willing collectors.
Did the library hire a private detective to try and find out who did the thefts and attempt to recover the items? The answer is no they didn't. The thefts were reported to the even more understaffed Detroit police who took the report and did not conduct any investigation.
There should be a public museum near Tiger stadium that would be a huge tourist attraction but there is not. Currently I do not think you can even get a reservation to view the collection.
https://www.nbcsports.com/mlb/news/ernie-harwells-memorabili...
https://www.liveauctioneers.com/news/top-news/collectiblesan...