News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The origins of the blink HTML element by m0nty on Thursday April 19, 2012 @05:51PM (#3865336)
Given all the JavaScript- and Flash-based assaults on the eye today, the blink tag seems charmingly benign.
Re:The origins of the blink HTML element by Teapot on Thursday April 19, 2012 @08:14PM (#3865859)
And animated gifs. They all have thier uses though. It's harder to think anything useful for blink.

The cops needs the blink tag for thier emergency ASCII,

       _<blink>o</blink>___
  ____/ _| _ \___
 | o           o |
Re:The origins of the blink HTML element by alttag on Thursday April 19, 2012 @08:37PM (#3865940)
Several years ago I visited a site that purported to have discovered the only acceptable use for the blink tag:

  Schrödinger's cat is <blink>not</blink> dead.
Re:The origins of the blink HTML element by EliAndrewC on Saturday April 21, 2012 @12:47AM (#3870932)
I believe that this is the origin of that joke: http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=20030427
Re:The origins of the blink HTML element by RedwoodCity on Thursday April 19, 2012 @07:25PM (#3865730)
Much better than the Ad that swings into the middle of the browser screen tag
Re:The origins of the blink HTML element by endianswap on Thursday April 19, 2012 @08:33PM (#3865929)
If it were the worst thing we had to deal with nowadays, do you think there'd be a Chrome extension called NoBlink?
Re:The origins of the blink HTML element by mcpherrinm on Thursday April 19, 2012 @08:34PM (#3865935)
It's annoying enough that disabling blink is a built-in feature in Firefox
Re:The origins of the blink HTML element by guccimane on Thursday April 19, 2012 @09:15PM (#3866051)
Perhaps, but those allow us to do things we otherwise couldn't. The blink tag just made annoying blinky text.