Both sides have been harmed. The war is about reducing continuing harm from an organisation that literally said that this was just the start of things...
It is the dominator culture, which feminism until the third wave was trying to abolish. Fourth wave feminism is a product of it.
So men don't lose in every conflict? Countries are "men's teams"?
I'm sorry but this is infantilizing as well as brutally sexist.
Current estimates suggest 2/3 of civilian deaths in Gaza consist of women and children. That leaves 1/3 of deaths being men. But this is disregarded altogether because sexist rhetoric is acceptable when you're a radical feminist UwU.
I can't find exact numbers easily, but a Turkish source said in 2023-November:
> The Palestinian Health Ministry said on Tuesday that the death toll from Israeli’s ongoing intensified onslaught on the Gaza Strip since Oct. 7 has jumped to 10,328 people. Among the killed are 4,237 children and 2,719 women, Gaza-based Health Ministry spokesman Ashraf al-Qudra said at a press conference. (https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/palestinian-death-toll-...)
10328 dead. 2719 were women. 4237 were children. Someone's missing-- oh, must be 3372 men.
It turns out men and children also comprise 2/3 of deaths right now. In raw numbers women are actually the least-affected of all demographics in the current conflict, but the narrative is touted that women have it worse. (The NYT corollary: black women always have it worse.)
To claim that women are the biggest losers in every conflict is histrionic bullshit. Men just don't count because we're stupid enough to defend them, while everybody loses in war-- children, most of all.
Nevertheless, even if the little elite that decides the fate of the peace wanting majority is 100% men, what does that now mean for suffering little men vs women?
The Israeli army btw has a surprisingly high percentage of women.. do now more men or women suffer? Please just let's stop with the nonsense, humans suffer.
Regardless of who wins, does that country now have to cherish and celebrate the men for what they did?
Do we look at human progress overall as "something done by men"? Because the vast majority was done by men. Do we look at cities as things "made by men"?
You can't have it both ways. Women either take credit and responsibility for contributions to society or they don't. Very few women in governments which decided to give voting rights to women, very few making decisions. Is giving women the right to vote an achievement from men? It's ridiculous.
If doing that involves building coalitions with people who don't care about men dying then so be it. If they do care then so be it. The important thing is where the opinion goes regarding war. What motivates it deserves discussion, but as long as the direction is good that is the most important thing settled.
When you're on the side of women and children, who lose in every conflict, everyone else gets confused because they expect you to pick one of the men's teams.
I know it's not quite as clear-cut in terms of age and sex who fights and who suffers, but I thought she made an excellent broader point about not picking any side other than those who are being harmed.