Re:Epic win: Jury decides Google has illegal monopoly in app...
by a1o on Tuesday December 12, 2023 @07:17AM
(#38611215)
Hey, re-read the dude post you are replying, there are parentheses to signal which specific actor or none for both. Perhaps they weren't there when you answered.
Re:Epic win: Jury decides Google has illegal monopoly in app...
by shiroiuma on Tuesday December 12, 2023 @08:48PM
(#38621639)
Please re-read it yourself, and compare with my quotes: it hasn't changed since my reply and my quotes are still accurate. I'm just pointing out that there are a few points I disagree with, or which are really the fault of the hardware makers (in Android's case).
You might be able to blame Apple for starting this and continuing it on their phones, but I don't think Google is pushing Android handset makers to do this at all, just like I don't think Google is pushing Samsung (and maybe some others) to eliminate 3.5mm headphone jacks on their phones. Unfortunately, I think this is one of those things where the whole industry is just copying each other. Non-removable batteries are better for manufacturers for various reasons, but bad for consumers, and they've conned consumers into accepting it.
>Unfriendly to repairs
Same here. Nothing is keeping Android phone makers from being repair-friendly.
>Updates obsolete old hardware
This is Apple-only. The Android counterpoint is "Updates simply cease after 2-3 years, leaving you with security vulnerabilities that won't be fixed", but here again it's the fault of the handset makers, not Google: they're just too lazy, and Google is too stupid and short-sighted to force them to support their phones longer-term to improve the Android brand image.