News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Epic win: Jury decides Google has illegal monopoly in app... by shiroiuma on Tuesday December 12, 2023 @02:05AM (#38610499)
>Battery not replaceable

You might be able to blame Apple for starting this and continuing it on their phones, but I don't think Google is pushing Android handset makers to do this at all, just like I don't think Google is pushing Samsung (and maybe some others) to eliminate 3.5mm headphone jacks on their phones. Unfortunately, I think this is one of those things where the whole industry is just copying each other. Non-removable batteries are better for manufacturers for various reasons, but bad for consumers, and they've conned consumers into accepting it.

>Unfriendly to repairs

Same here. Nothing is keeping Android phone makers from being repair-friendly.

>Updates obsolete old hardware

This is Apple-only. The Android counterpoint is "Updates simply cease after 2-3 years, leaving you with security vulnerabilities that won't be fixed", but here again it's the fault of the handset makers, not Google: they're just too lazy, and Google is too stupid and short-sighted to force them to support their phones longer-term to improve the Android brand image.

Re:Epic win: Jury decides Google has illegal monopoly in app... by a1o on Tuesday December 12, 2023 @07:17AM (#38611215)
Hey, re-read the dude post you are replying, there are parentheses to signal which specific actor or none for both. Perhaps they weren't there when you answered.
Re:Epic win: Jury decides Google has illegal monopoly in app... by shiroiuma on Tuesday December 12, 2023 @08:48PM (#38621639)
Please re-read it yourself, and compare with my quotes: it hasn't changed since my reply and my quotes are still accurate. I'm just pointing out that there are a few points I disagree with, or which are really the fault of the hardware makers (in Android's case).