Epic win: Jury decides Google has illegal monopoly in app store fight

Re:Epic win: Jury decides Google has illegal monopoly in app... by meepmorp on Tuesday December 12, 2023 @12:58AM (#38610049)

I think what they meant could be rephrased as, "for as long as there's been an App Store, it's been part of the OS. "

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Epic win: Jury decides Google has illegal monopoly in app... by kohlerm on Tuesday December 12, 2023 @01:46AM (#38610368)

What does thad mean "part of the OS"? It is not built into the kernel, and is therefore no part of the OS. I do not see why the same would not apply to Apple. But maybe the US legal system is just totally broken ...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Epic win: Jury decides Google has illegal monopoly in app... by meepmorp on Tuesday December 12, 2023 @07:54AM (#38611520)

There's plenty of parts of an OS that aren't the kernel.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Epic win: Jury decides Google has illegal monopoly in app... by oarsinsync on Tuesday December 12, 2023 @01:09AM (#38610125)

Which I believe is also false. The jailbroken appstores predate the apple appstore.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Epic win: Jury decides Google has illegal monopoly in app... by ClumsyPilot on Tuesday December 12, 2023 @07:29AM (#38611326)

You are playing semantics - "He is not a slave, he is an endantured servant, nothing wrong here"

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Epic win: Jury decides Google has illegal monopoly in app... by meepmorp on Tuesday December 12, 2023 @07:56AM (#38611548)

I'm rephrasing another person's statement to clarify what (I believe) they meant.

Separately, that's kind of a gross choice of comparisons.

[ Parent | on HN ]