Re:Epic win: Jury decides Google has illegal monopoly in app...
by brandensilva on Monday December 11, 2023 @11:23PM
(#38609449)
Just a slight clarification. The first Apple iPhone did not have an app store.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Epic win: Jury decides Google has illegal monopoly in app...
by meepmorp on Tuesday December 12, 2023 @12:58AM
(#38610049)
I think what they meant could be rephrased as, "for as long as there's been an App Store, it's been part of the OS. "
Re:Epic win: Jury decides Google has illegal monopoly in app...
by kohlerm on Tuesday December 12, 2023 @01:46AM
(#38610368)
What does thad mean "part of the OS"? It is not built into the kernel, and is therefore no part of the OS. I do not see why the same would not apply to Apple.
But maybe the US legal system is just totally broken ...
Re:Epic win: Jury decides Google has illegal monopoly in app...
by meepmorp on Tuesday December 12, 2023 @07:54AM
(#38611520)
There's plenty of parts of an OS that aren't the kernel.
Re:Epic win: Jury decides Google has illegal monopoly in app...
by oarsinsync on Tuesday December 12, 2023 @01:09AM
(#38610125)
Which I believe is also false. The jailbroken appstores predate the apple appstore.
Re:Epic win: Jury decides Google has illegal monopoly in app...
by ClumsyPilot on Tuesday December 12, 2023 @07:29AM
(#38611326)
You are playing semantics - "He is not a slave, he is an endantured servant, nothing wrong here"
Re:Epic win: Jury decides Google has illegal monopoly in app...
by meepmorp on Tuesday December 12, 2023 @07:56AM
(#38611548)
I'm rephrasing another person's statement to clarify what (I believe) they meant.
Separately, that's kind of a gross choice of comparisons.
Re:Epic win: Jury decides Google has illegal monopoly in app...
by godzillabrennus on Tuesday December 12, 2023 @01:05AM
(#38610102)
It was added to the original iPhone with iPhone OS 2.