Re:The first electro-mechanical desktop synthesizer
by sideshowb on Thursday December 07, 2023 @06:02PM
(#38563005)
The trumpet on my prophesy ain't half bad but yes I concede that point.
For synthetic sounds however, at this point I think it's mostly a question of workflow. Like yes you can take time to program all those imperfections into a digital sound. Or you can take time to make an analog device which has them inherently.
Re:The first electro-mechanical desktop synthesizer
by WalterBright on Thursday December 07, 2023 @06:08PM
(#38563041)
Motors always have imperfections, resonances, feedback from the room its in, etc. I don't know if they'd have enough for it to be audible.
Re:The first electro-mechanical desktop synthesizer
by fuzzfactor on Thursday December 07, 2023 @06:50PM
(#38563466)
Plus the only way to emultate it is to have the real thing as a reference beforehand.
Re:The first electro-mechanical desktop synthesizer
by v1ne on Friday December 08, 2023 @02:53AM
(#38566443)
Indeed, motors are physical devices with their own imperfections. But … these are brushless motors, tightly controlled with a feedback loop. They, as they also say in their videos, very quickly follow input changes. I wonder how much weird effects you might hear on those.
Any motor-based oscillator can be accurately emulated by a digital oscillator, so the answer to the original question is "nothing." But yeah, neither is good enough to emulate a trumpet played by a human.