I'm a Canuck, but you need to call a thing what it is.
For example, sanctions could be something done as part of this bill. Arresting a Dutch person on US soil.
You may not like this bill, and I personally don't have much of an opinion on it, but it does not say "arrest and we will immediately invade and blow up cities and take control of your entire nation". It isn't even directed at the Netherlands directly, instead the court, wherever that may be now or in the future.
Saying "The threatened to invade" is an effort to put the worst possible spin on it. And without context, it makes it sound like this happened 2 weeks ago, such as "The US moved a carrier group to the coast of the Netherlands, and they're threatening to invade!"
The only way I would accept language like "threatened to invade" would be if it was actually threatened.
All EU countries bend their backs when US say so.
You don't have permission to access "http://www.wusa9.com/article/news/verify/american-is-charged..." on this server.
Reference #18.4ff01602.1701774868.1c0af8dc"""
(Why is it redirecting to http?)
No way the US threatened troops into the Netherlands, and the Dutch would have never capitulated. At all.
All of Western Europe would join in.
The best I can figure is the US threatened to extract someone in an op. That's not invasion, and even that seems hard to buy.
So link please. And to a real news source, not some guy going on about it on tiktok or youtube, or a blog by a random person.