News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Stuxnet Source Code by speps on Monday December 04, 2023 @03:58AM (#38515122)
Looks like most of this reply is ChatGPT generated...

"but the specific code targeting PLCs might be in other parts of the codebase that aren't as clearly identified" is something I've seen it generate when I asked details about a codebase as well, but it didn't have all the details.

Re:Stuxnet Source Code by ryanjshaw on Monday December 04, 2023 @05:04AM (#38515501)
The grammar is poor in places suggesting human editing, but I'll bet 10 bucks this is mostly ChatGPT too. OP testing a new GitHub code walkthrough tool? 1 day ago OP professed being quite familiar with ChatGPT's capabilities. OP, next time just give us a link to your tool's beta analysis of the repo.
Re:Stuxnet Source Code by dfox on Monday December 04, 2023 @06:28AM (#38516002)
Also, it is mostly wrong. The whole /dropper part is the initial loader, which has nothing to do with either hiding the presence or the actual PLC payload. Effectively it is an somewhat obfuscated stub for obfuscated self-extracting archive that is an dll and not executable.