'may' being the key word here. This is just one model out of hundreds that so far have not gotten concensus support.

Remember: 'All models are wrong, some are usefull'. The former is a certainty, the latter only time will tell.

Forgive my scepticism. I live in a region where cutting down forests that are hundreds of years old and incinerating them is concidered 'carbon neutral' because lobbyists managed to influence an Excel formula, and eliminating forests for swampland is cheered on by 'ecologists' because the forests were planted in the middle ages to drain the swamps and provide hunting grounds and are thus 'fake' according to some arbitrary choice of historical reference.