Unless the law specifically enshrines the privilege of one named private party above others?
Any of that make sense?
Yes! Sweden has laws around labour disputes. Again, these are deeply precedented. Even the experience of American companies being caught pants down in their respect is precedented.
But these things haven't been pitted against each other in court. The state has to provide these services according to law, but workers can strike according to law. So what happens when these two things oppose each other? That is what these lawsuits are supposed to figure out.
So it makes perfect sense to sue in this case. Clearing these things up is a really good thing.
https://www.svt.se/nyheter/inrikes/domstol-teslas-registreri...
Guarantee mortgages with the implicit backing of the U.S.? Yes.
There are loads of other examples of NGOs being granted limited monopolies. The NFL is a famous example. The MPAA and NCMEC others.
Sure. But you can't sue Fannie Mae for denying you guarantees under the equal protection clause.