News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Training for one trillion parameter model backed by Intel... by AndrewKemendo on Friday November 24, 2023 @11:06AM (#38405316)
Except governments don’t currently go do war on behalf of the citizens or for protection of the “homeland.” They go to war “overseas” on behalf of the corporations that employ citizens that vote certain ways, in order to maintain the current global structure of US political dominion.

I know because I served as an officer in one of those wars on behalf of the United States (among other things that were also not beneficial to citizens). That had absolutely nothing to do with protecting US citizens directly.

It was chiefly about maintaining petro-dollar power and reinforcing the financial-corporate-govt collusion that maintains the current capitalist structures.

The structure of an organized body politic is not the problem.

The problem is that the body politic has been beaten into submission by those same corporate-government oligarchs to such an extent that most people just “go with the flow” because fighting it is exhausting and seemingly impossible.

Re:Training for one trillion parameter model backed by Intel... by nyc_data_geek1 on Friday November 24, 2023 @11:18AM (#38405450)
War Is A Racket, as Smedley Butler accurately wrote.
Re:Training for one trillion parameter model backed by Intel... by AndrewKemendo on Friday November 24, 2023 @11:21AM (#38405506)
Precisely this

Link here too for everyone:

https://archive.org/details/WarIsARacket

Re:Training for one trillion parameter model backed by Intel... by astrange on Friday November 24, 2023 @03:03PM (#38407621)
No, this is wrong. Saying war is for money gives war too much credit - it's not good for anything and it doesn't make anyone any money. The opportunity cost is too great.

The US does not care about "the petrodollar". Nor do we care about foreign oil. Nor do we have remotely the same economy we did in 1935.

In fact, war is not even profitable for our military industrial complex. They profit from the threat of war because that funds development of untested superweapons. Actual wars mean all that stuff actually has to work though, and there's a chance you'll get nationalized.

But if it was good for some MIC rich people, it still wouldn't matter, because they're outnumbered by all the other rich people it's bad for.

Re:Training for one trillion parameter model backed by Intel... by nyc_data_geek1 on Sunday November 26, 2023 @09:09PM (#38427297)
It's not true, though. War is an effective wealth transfer mechanism - from the lower/working classes to the rich war parasite class. Halliburton absolutely profited from the Iraq invasion, though in aggregate you're absolutely right that prosperity is reduced by wars.